The assessment system for the Unified State Exam in mathematics at the profile level is much more complicated. Firstly, exam tasks have different “prices”. The tasks from the first part (with a short answer) are the cheapest; the most “expensive” are the last two problems (an equation or inequality with a parameter and a problem in number theory).
In 2016, an ideal solution to all nineteen tasks can bring 32 primary scores. The maximum number of points has decreased by two compared to 2015, since the first part now offers 12 tasks instead of 14.
Primary scores are converted to test scores. The conversion scale varies slightly from year to year. Below is the table that was used at the Unified State Examination in mathematics in 2015. Please note that the corresponding function is very different from linear: rapid growth in the area of low scores gives way to a smoother one in the middle of the scale.
Unified State Examination in mathematics (profile level). Scale for converting primary scores into test scores
| Primary score | Test score |
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 5 |
| 2 | 9 |
| 3 | 14 |
| 4 | 18 |
| 5 | 23 |
| 6 | 27 |
| 7 | 33 |
| 8 | 39 |
| 9 | 45 |
| 10 | 50 |
| 11 | 55 |
| 12 | 59 |
| 13 | 64 |
| 14 | 68 |
| 15 | 70 |
| 16 | 72 |
| 17 | 74 |
| 18 | 76 |
| 19 | 78 |
| 20 | 80 |
| 21 | 82 |
| 22 | 84 |
| 23 | 86 |
| 24 | 88 |
| 25 | 90 |
| 26 | 92 |
| 27 | 94 |
| 28 | 96 |
| 29 | 97 |
| 30 | 98 |
| 31 | 99 |
| 32 | 100 |
| 33 | 100 |
| 34 | 100 |
To enter a university you must earn a minimum 27 points(i.e., solve 6 simple tasks from the first part). Naturally, admission to serious educational institutions requires significantly higher results.
I would like to emphasize once again: the table above is just a guide! When assigning a test score, not only the number of primary points is taken into account, but also the relative complexity of the problems solved, as well as the number of students who completed a particular task. Thus, the final “formula” for transferring points will be known only after passing the Unified State Examination - 2016 in mathematics by all graduates.
How many tasks do you need to complete to get a certain score on the Unified State Exam? This question can be answered using a special scales for converting primary scores into test scores.
The scale indicates the correspondence between the primary and test scores.
Primary points- This preliminary points before being transferred to a 100-point scale (for example, in the Russian language you can score 2 primary points for task No. 1, and 1 primary point for task No. 2). You can view the distribution of points for tasks in this article. Raw scores are converted to test scores.
Test scores- This final points after conversion to a 100-point scale, with which applicants enter the university. For one item you can get no more than 100 test points.
Violet color
Points that are not enough to pass the Unified State Exam are highlighted.
In redThe minimum scores confirming passing the Unified State Exam are highlighted.
Maximum number of primary points (USE 2016):
Russian language – 57 (+1)
;
Mathematics – 32 (-2)
;
Social studies – 62 (0)
;
Physics – 50 (0)
;
Biology – 61 (0)
;
History – 53 (-6)
;
Chemistry – 64 (0)
;
Foreign languages – 100 (0)
;
Computer Science and ICT – 35 (0)
;
Literature – 42 (0)
;
Geography – 47 (-4)
.
The change in primary scores compared to 2015 is indicated in parentheses.
If the number of primary points does not change, then the scale for transferring points remains unchanged. Therefore, we can say that the scale according to social studies, physics, biology, chemistry, foreign languages, computer science And literature for 2016 it is 100% accurate. The greatest ambiguity is the scale for mathematics, because in 2015 this year scale taken “out of thin air”, it defies any logic; It is unclear what the math scale will look like in 2016.
Scale for converting points into grades according to mathematics (basic level) is presented below:
IMHO, in mathematics it’s something like this. I would say from 75 (according to previous years, I have not yet looked at the ratio of “solved problems to Unified State Exam points”). 100 points means very good knowledge + a little luck + psychological stability.
Added after 6 minutes 27 seconds:
There is a free tutor - Internet, books, etc. But... you have to plow, plow yourself without reminders and control. And another question: in what years did a person from an ordinary high school, who made no independent efforts, enter Moscow State University, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, etc.? Why did VZMS exist and exist? Why were FMS created?
Added after 7 minutes 34 seconds:
IMHO, and send the child to the appropriate place...
For some reason I remembered an older colleague. Its “homeland” is Pervomaika, with its “ceiling” being NIIZhT. So he arrived there safely. In mathematics I asked the teacher a lot of questions. To which he said: “Young man, you need to go to NSU with such questions!” Where he went and successfully graduated.
Well, we can make an assessment based on graduates, and there are statistics for the last 10 years. AND? What fundamentally new will happen there? if the teachers pass?
The “subject” is taught in schools in different amounts, some have 10 hours of mathematics per week, some have three. What in this context is “to know the subject”?
Once upon a time, assignments were offered during the entrance exams to NSU. which “do not go beyond the scope of the school curriculum, but require the creative application of knowledge acquired at school.” The Unified State Examination specification declares that 100 points requires knowledge that goes beyond the scope of the general education class curriculum.
In general, there has long been an intention when certifying teachers to force them to take the Unified State Exam in the subject. Maybe we’re arguing here, but the teachers are already passing?
That is, I am not against teachers going to take the Unified State Exam of their own free will. But I don’t know what fundamentally new things will happen from such a surrender. Teachers have the opportunity to take an option and decide at any time. And see what is difficult for them personally. And are there children who need to be taught what the teacher himself does not and cannot do? And if there is, then what should we do? In general, this is how teachers work. Yusha
You shouldn't rate our teachers so low. What then did children “forget” in such schools, in your opinion?
I am much more optimistic than you and believe that most teachers will pass the Unified State Exam very well, many with 90-100 points. Not all, probably. So there is no need to set requirements for everyone to pass at 100. You just need to go and pass. How long will it take?
Nobody will judge you and me now. We DO NOT know how the teachers would write it. But if they knew, they could evaluate the Unified State Examination itself and the school education system.
In particular, find an understanding of such things:
“This is an exam that you can definitely pass with a 100 if you know the subject.”
Or
“This is an exam that you can definitely pass with a 70 if you know the subject. And 100 is for geniuses.”
And there will also be an understanding of this question:
"This is an exam that you can pass with 90-100 without a tutor"
Or
“This is an exam that cannot be passed with 90-100 without a tutor.”
Now society has a strange attitude towards the Unified State Exam, there are many myths, many reproaches. Perhaps they are fair, perhaps not.
It seems to me that if all teachers passed this exam, there would be fewer myths, and also, there would be changes in the exam itself, and teachers would reveal all the problems that exist in it.
And now teachers are really scaring EGE children. Because for them it is the unknown. And if you went through it yourself, there would be less fear!
Problem 19 is an Olympiad problem. The 17th task is also very often not a weak one.
IMHO, a level of 90-100 points is the level of preparation and an indicator of the ability to study at the best universities in the country. Explain to me: where will such a number of such teachers come from in the country's schools? What did they forget there at such a level?
Added after 48 seconds:
For what? Some children require personal interaction. Sometimes one tiny clarification is missing. 21OKSI
Well, that’s why there used to be a system of Olympiads and a physics and mathematics school. And now oops. In the same way, smart children in good schools are trained for the Olympiads. So that the 19th task is solved.
But either this issue must be resolved at the state level, with the possibility of choice. or at the individual level. parents are looking for an opportunity for their own child.
In general, the Internet makes things a lot easier. It is quite possible to find an analysis of solutions to problems 18 and 19. sono io
IMHO - because "no".
Because it doesn’t matter whether it’s a humanities class or not, but the student should have the opportunity to receive full consultation from his teacher. There is no need to divide children into classes, as if the choice of class really means something important. In some gymnasiums and lyceums, the competition in the physics and mathematics class is off the charts, and children with an above-average level of preparation end up in the humanities (chemical-biological, philological, historical, economics, etc.) classes.
And no one says that the teacher is obliged to pull out every student. The teacher must achieve a decent score in the Unified State Examination. Otherwise, no matter how talented a teacher he is, he will not be able to prepare a student for a high score - because he himself does not know the answer.
21OKSI
At my eldest son's school, the teacher went over task 18 with them - in detail and at length. And many guys solved it successfully. About 19 - I don’t know what it is. And I remember about 18, because they discussed it a lot.
This is still a big question about the right to choose. Our city is somewhat smaller than Novosibirsk - 6 schools and a gymnasium. In none of the schools, not one of the teachers, even in specialized mathematics groups, dealt with tasks 18 and 19 with children. For some, their parents worked with them (I know one like that, I was lucky), but for others, they had no choice at all. Even though we don’t need specialized mathematics, if something happens, the only choice is to move. It’s scary to think about villages in relation to this situation.
I would say. that every student has the right to choose a teacher who can prepare him to a high level. But whether to use this right is up to the student. There are a huge number of children. who do not need this high level at all. Then it is only to the detriment of the student that his super-duper teacher forcibly drags him to high Unified State Exam scores. Passed the basics - demonstrated knowledge of mathematics at a cultural level. We need mathematics as the basis for further development - we need a teacher of a higher level.
Yes, let him work in some 11th humanities school, why not? sono io
We do not ask whether the child wants to go to Baumanka or to a local university. He goes and solves all the Unified State Exam tasks and gets his score. So the teacher must go and decide. And get your score. What's so difficult about it?
Regarding the fact that not all teachers prepare for a high level of the Unified State Exam.... This is a difficult question. We seem to have equal rights to education. This means that EVERY student has the right to a teacher who CAN prepare him for a high level of the Unified State Exam. I don't think this should be exactly 100 points. But still, a teacher should be able to get a fairly high score. If a teacher is not ready for this, IMHO, he should not work in 11th grade. Any other time, but not 11.
Why? There are different teachers, not all work in depth. There are excellent school teachers who teach the basic level. That is, for a specialized exam, but within the framework of the general education program. Why demand from them the full version of the Unified State Exam, designed for admission to the best specialized universities in the country?
What do you mean by “solve the Unified State Exam”? Decide on the minimum to get a certificate? decide on the level of enrollment at a local university? Is it necessary to decide on a level, for example, Moscow State University or Baumanka?
And one more thing: the ability to do something yourself and the ability to explain to another... somewhat different things... It’s strange if it’s difficult for an amplifier to solve the exam. Then what will he teach the children? It is a pity that only one teacher in Russia made such a decision. I am sure that all teachers working with 11th graders must take the Unified State Exam in their discipline every year together with their students. And this is not a test of the teacher’s knowledge, this is a test of the Unified State Examination procedure - this is how you should approach it!
Well, the Unified State Exam should not be difficult for a teacher!
Why is this act of a teacher “certainly worthy of respect,” but for students this is an ordinary event?
If all teachers in Russia passed the Unified State Exam, I am sure this would be the reason for some adjustments both in the Unified State Exam and in the curriculum. Krasnoyarsk gymnasium teacher Oksana Fan-Di, together with her students, passed the literature exam. The teacher notes that the purpose of such an unusual experiment was not only to test one’s own knowledge.