Recently, the press secretary of the President of Russia, Dmitry Peskov, issued another statement: he called on the West "not to demonize Russia", predictably they did not pay attention to him. The world's Western media, with some frenzy, are molding an "image of an aggressor" out of Russia. In the invention of reasons, they are not shy.
The coup d'état in Kyiv and the coming to power of the Banderaites, the West forgave itself. But the fact that in the south-east of Ukraine Russia does not allow, as in Odessa, to kill and burn the Russian-speaking population to the Bandera Nazis, is already both occupation and aggression that threatens the security of the West. Allegedly, therefore, anti-Russian sanctions have been deployed, but the reputable Western media are seriously discussing scenarios for the start of a hot war with Russia, a “global lightning-fast” nuclear missile blitzkrieg after Hitler. British Prime Minister Theresa May and her Secretary of Defense publicly admitted the possibility of Britain's first preventive nuclear strike... Together with the Americans?
World wars do not happen “suddenly”: they are prepared for a long time and purposefully, not only militarily, but also in the media and information space. The media and the entire cultural sphere are beginning to work in such a way that the peoples will hate each other, and the voices of reason will die out completely. When this goal is achieved, war is almost inevitable... This goal is pursued by the deliberate demonization of Russia by the Western media, which in fact turn into LSU - a mass lie media, commissioned by political power circles, which Teresa May admitted. Therefore, all calls from Russia to stop are ignored.
Russia is not yet embarking on the path of information warfare, and calls on the West to abandon the informational preparation of a world war. However, the waves of propaganda hatred from the West are causing more and more retaliatory waves of hatred from the East. Moscow cannot completely stop them: they spontaneously arise in the Russian media, cultural and information space after getting acquainted with the products of Western agitprop.
On the other hand, the West for Russia, objectively, is becoming an increasingly racist and fascist community of countries, as in the 30s of the last century, with which an equal, mutually beneficial dialogue is not possible. Because they consider themselves "exceptional", "civilized", and even officially classify others as "developing democracies", that is, underdeveloped peoples who can and should be taught. This is ordinary Western fascism, covered with a democratic fig leaf, from which Hitler's fascism began. True, so far without Hitler, but, the time will come, he will also appear in the West.
Russia sees with its own eyes that the West is creating on its borders an analogue of fascist Germany in the form of Bandera Ukraine, which does not hide either its relationship with Hitler's Bandera accomplices from the OUN-UPA, or the ideology of racial and cultural superiority over the "genetically inferior" Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. The West, so insightful in other cases, does not see the formation of Bandera fascism taking place in Ukraine. Why? After all, he creates it himself, but not only for this reason.
In the West itself, the encouragement of fascism by Western liberalism is repeated, which, in practice, are connected by the same ideological message of cultural, or civilizational, superiority. First, liberal extremist activists spread their "exclusive" values and power in a peaceful "democratic" way, in "white gloves", and when white gloves fail, they turn to the "black gloves" of the Nazis. As it happened in Germany in 1933, and in Ukraine in 2014, when the peaceful Euromaidan, as it were, suddenly turned into a neo-fascist putsch of Bandera's "Right Sector".
German liberals were involved in the coming to power of Hitler, and many famous philosophers, writers and intellectuals, for example, the titan of Western philosophy Martin Heidegger and the Nobel laureate Norwegian Knut Hamsun, went to his service, just as today Ukrainian liberals, and many Russian ones, cooperate with Bandera fascists. Liberal extremism and Nazi extremism always find, in the end, a common language.
Today, the West is losing to Putin’s Russia, which managed to rely on the non-Western world, one party after another: in Syria, in Afghanistan, in Ukraine, it does not achieve its goals, because Russia always takes the “wrong side of history”, according to the revelation of former US President Barak Obama. Anti-Russian sanctions are just as useless. This causes anti-Russian hysteria among the Western power elites, and, objectively, pushes the world to the “red line”, when hatred blinds its eyes and a simple accident, an unintentional mistake, can become fatal.
The personal doctor of Slobodan Milosevic, ex-president of Serbia, Professor Andric Vukashin wrote a book in which he charged the Hague Tribunal with the murder of Milosevic, poisoning him with droperidol in a prison cell. This statement will predictably not be investigated by the Hague or any other international court, the Western public will ignore it, or declare it to be Russian propaganda. If Western, quite reputable media discuss the possibility of assassinating Russian President Putin and even American President Trump, what is the assassination of Milosevic to them? In what language can one speak with such media of mass lies, such a public? Only in the language of the information war: to live with wolves - howl like a wolf ...
Third World War – 2019
Opinion of a Russian military expert
The United States set out to achieve overwhelming nuclear superiority in order to blackmail Russia and China. It must be understood that the Americans will extend it to other countries, including allied countries, but capable of conducting an independent foreign policy like Turkey for example. The conclusion about the inevitability of the US attempt to switch to a policy of nuclear blackmail was made by the author five years ago, when the failure of the Arab Spring operation became obvious. And before that, America suffered a military-political defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Having crushed the troops of Saddam Hussein and partially the Taliban irregulars, the US army was unable to establish and maintain control of the occupied territories.
The puppet governments formed by Washington had no choice but to seek consensus with the guerrilla national liberation forces. As a result, the Americans failed to stay in Iraq, whose leadership quickly switched to a multi-vector policy with a priority orientation towards Iran.
In Afghanistan, US troops control only their bases, the rest of the territory is under the rule of the "long-destroyed" (George Bush announced this) Taliban, tribal groups and radical Islamic groups. Behind government troops is a small part of the country. At the same time, the IRA authorities cannot be called puppet in any way, since they are forced to focus on the opinions of other forces in Afghanistan, which for the most part take an anti-American position.
In other words, the United States, using the provocation of September 11, 2001, tried to establish control over the key resources of the Middle East and thereby ensure the ability to regulate the development of other countries, primarily the "tigers" of Southeast Asia, but failed. Neither military nor soft power helped.
At the same time, the economic and spiritual leadership of the United States is rapidly melting.
On the one hand, China is stepping on its heels, developing at an unprecedented pace ( repeating the breakthrough of the USSR in the 30-50s of the last century). On the other hand, the peoples and even the elites of most countries are becoming more and more clearly opposed to the ideas of liberal fundamentalism, the main spiritual base for the expansion of the American and transnational establishment.
Under these conditions, in the hands of the elites claiming world domination, there was only one . However, they are prevented from blackmailing the world by the Russian potential of strategic nuclear forces, with the help of which military parity with the United States is maintained.
Obama paved the way
When the transnational and American powers that be understood that nothing but a nuclear club was left to maintain dominance in the world, attempts began to achieve superiority in this area.
The United States had two main advantages over the Russian Federation: a huge return potential, which at that time (2012-2014) was estimated at six thousand warheads, and the presence of significant stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as about 500 tons of plutonium (such a figure "walks" on the Internet) .
Let me remind you that the return potential of the United States was formed as a result of the fact that they retained their warheads, while Russia dismantled and handed over the freed weapons-grade uranium and plutonium to the Americans in fulfillment of the Chernomyrdin-Gore deal.
In addition, we physically destroyed our ICBMs, which are to be eliminated, while the Americans are only the first stages, and the rest is stored. In other words, Washington has the opportunity to quickly increase its potential by abandoning restrictive treaties, while Moscow does not have such a resource.
The Americans could achieve superiority in two ways. Initiate the processes of liquidation of Russian nuclear weapons, imposing treaties on demilitarization in the nuclear sphere up to complete disarmament. President Obama followed this path.
Our country was persuaded to adopt START-3, as a result of which the deployed nuclear potentials of the Russian Federation and the United States were more than halved. As a result, nuclear war has found expediency.
Nuclear winter no longer threatens, and one can count on victory, and the remaining small potential of the enemy is easier to destroy with a disarming preemptive strike. Obama continued to push for deeper cuts in this area. Fortunately, Moscow did not agree to this, keeping its nuclear potential at the minimum acceptable level. It became clear that the Yankees would not achieve anything further along this path.
It remains for the Americans to replenish their nuclear arsenals at a rapid pace in order to leave Russia far behind in terms of the number of deployed warheads and carriers. At the same time, the States need to use the remaining return potential as efficiently as possible, including the saved second stages of ICBMs, which should have been eliminated under the previous START treaties. They remained quite suitable medium-range missiles.
Probably, this can explain the American interest in breaking the INF Treaty first. Preparations for leaving it began long ago, even under Obama.
The 45th President of the United States, simple and straightforward, only announced what the Washington administration had been preparing for a long time. Hence the conclusion: the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty was inevitable and completely independent of Russia's actions.
And the White House will be in a hurry. After all, dominance is becoming more and more elusive, especially with the rapidly emerging Russian-Chinese military-political alliance, which the United States, no matter how hard they try, cannot destroy. So what will happen in a relatively close historical time. Within a few years. Immediately after the creation of an appropriate moral, psychological and international legal framework. More precisely, its imitations ...
Washington must be destroyed...
What should Russia do?
First of all, multiply nuclear missile weapons. There can be no mirror answer. Nuclear buildup should pose a threat to the United States, not Europe.
At the same time, weapons must be and ensure the guaranteed destruction of an overseas aggressor under any conditions. It is the destruction that is important, not the infliction of unacceptable damage, since its size varies depending on the situation in the world and in the United States itself. Under certain conditions, it may turn out that the death of tens of millions of Americans from a Russian retaliatory strike will turn out to be quite acceptable damage for the US and, even more so, the transnational elite.
That is, we need a superweapon with warheads of the order of 100 megatons and intercontinental cruise missiles. Today, judging by the information provided by our President, work in this direction is underway.
“An IRBM strike with a conventional warhead may turn out to be the most effective due to its high density, surprise, short flight time and massing”
Another most important condition for nuclear parity is to ensure the combat stability of nuclear weapons and the control system of strategic nuclear forces. And the threat to these components can be very serious.
After all, the main reason why the USSR in 1987 was that the Pershing-2 missiles in just five to seven minutes of flight time reached command posts, launchers and other strategic nuclear forces facilities in the European part of our country. With a hit accuracy of 30 meters standard deviation, targets were guaranteed to be destroyed.
As a result, the USSR could lose the possibility of a retaliatory nuclear strike or had to be ready to launch it even if the missile attack warning system falsely went off: there was no time left for a reliable classification of detected targets. The result is an agreement to a disproportionately large reduction in our nuclear missile potential in comparison with the American one, as well as the deployment of the Perimeter system.
Today, breaking the INF Treaty, the Pentagon, obviously, is counting on the deployment of medium-range ballistic missiles in the immediate vicinity of our borders - in the countries of the former Warsaw Pact, and also in the hope that, having gone for a mirror response, the Russian Federation will divert part of its already limited nuclear potential to Europe.
To prevent this, we, apparently, are unlikely to be able to. We need to think about how to neutralize the threat. To do this, it is worth paying attention to the main weaknesses of the US-formed nuclear grouping of BR and medium-range missiles.
Note: these missiles hit stationary targets, mobile objects are too tough for them. It is also important that on the descending part of the trajectory in the target area, both the BR and the CR, using the seeker, radar or optical, must recognize and aim at the target (correlation principle). The third weakness is the dependence of the CD on the space navigation system "Navstar" .
In addition, it is necessary to place positions close (in a strategic sense) to our borders - within 500-1000 kilometers, which already makes them vulnerable. If you put it further, the MRBMs lose their main advantage - a short flight time, and for the Tomahawk CR, the possible zone of destruction of objects on our territory is significantly reduced.
https://youtu.be/dU8YiQPz96Q
Watch the video
Arsenal of counterstrike
The moment of transition to the use of nuclear weapons will be preceded by a fairly long (from several days to a month or more) period. The outbreak of war with a massive nuclear missile strike is extremely unlikely due to political, moral, psychological, legal circumstances, at least at the present time and in the medium term.
However, if the aggressor decides to start a war with a nuclear missile attack, this will be preceded by a fairly long period of threat (from several months to a year or even more), during which the tension between the US and Russia will be exceptionally high.
A direct sign that the aggressor is ready to strike may be the recall of the ambassador and the staff of the diplomatic mission. There will be other signs of preparation for war. In particular, the deployment of troops near our borders under the guise of exercises, the creation of strike groups of the Navy in areas from where it is possible to strike at the territory of Russia.
This gives you plenty of time to take preventive action. In particular, to inflict a preventive strike with conventional weapons on the base areas of BR and KR aimed at Russia.
For this, hypersonic missiles (ballistic or aeroballistic), as well as KR type and with conventional warheads, are suitable. Such a strike during the conduct of a database with non-nuclear weapons does not mean a transition to the use of nuclear weapons and, at the same time, will significantly weaken or even prevent a disarming and decapitating missile strike with a minimum flight time.
The required firing range of our IRBMs is determined by the probable deployment areas for American missile launchers. Today it is in Poland and Romania.
It is impossible to exclude the appearance of such missiles even where the Americans manage to push local governments to such a step. Accordingly, for our MRBMs with conventional equipment, it is quite enough to shoot at a range of 2000-2500 kilometers. However, the accuracy of the hit and the size of the warhead should ensure a reliable defeat of an engineering-protected point object, and the reaction time, flight time and seeker should ensure the guaranteed incapacitation of mobile IRBM launchers.
Today, the Russian Federation has a sufficient arsenal to strike at probable US IRBM base areas.
These are Caliber and X-101 missiles, as well as a complex that fires at a distance of about two thousand kilometers. However, the development of a medium-range ballistic missile with a conventional warhead would not hurt, since it is precisely such a strike that can be most effective due to its high density (minimal salvo range), surprise, short flight time and massing. These missiles also have high combat stability when countered by air defense and missile defense systems.
It is realistic to develop such a weapon within an acceptable timeframe based on the OTRK missile. The complex, of course, must be mobile. According to the author's estimates, it will be necessary to deploy from 50-100 to 150-200 such missiles, depending on how many medium-range ballistic missiles and missiles the enemy places near our borders.
With the withdrawal of the United States from the INF Treaty, it becomes possible to create a medium-range nuclear deterrence capability. Its purpose is to deliver a nuclear missile strike against NATO invasion forces in the event of a large-scale war. After all, the military potential of NATO is many times greater than the Russian one (it is worth recalling that the military potential of the state, in addition to the armed forces, includes industry, and economically the countries of the alliance are superior to Russia by more than an order of magnitude).
Today, the main means of delivering Russian tactical nuclear weapons, based on the available weapons and their TTD, is aviation, the possibility of breaking through to the designated targets is doubtful given the enemy’s air superiority and reliable control of the situation throughout the entire depth of the European theater of operations (NATO has a significant number of AWACS aircraft). Therefore, the development and adoption into service will ensure reliable nuclear missile deterrence in the European theater and in other theaters too. In addition, the deployment of such a grouping could put significant political pressure on states where the US would seek to deploy its medium-range missiles.
The appearance in the Russian Federation of even a few such IRBMs will assure the elites that the Americans are going to turn their territory into a nuclear theater.
Note: this is not a mirror answer - the purpose of the missiles is completely different. Yes, and they will require relatively few of them: according to my estimates, within a hundred.
Thus, the Russian Federation is able to relatively inexpensively create a medium-range counterforce potential in Europe. However, this only partially fends off threats, as it makes it possible to effectively hit only stationary objects.
It is very difficult to neutralize a mobile component, in particular launchers of the IRBM, if only for the reason that tracking the position of its elements and issuing target designation to strike forces in the operational and even more so strategic depth of building a NATO force grouping in Europe will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, in wartime .
In addition, the US is unlikely to stop at the IRBM. Yes, and measures to ensure their combat stability will be taken quite seriously. Therefore, other efforts must be made to improve the combat stability of our strategic nuclear forces, primarily their control systems against US IRBM strikes.
2019-02-27T10:56:45+05:00 Analytical ServiceDefense of the Fatherlandwar, Russia, watch video, USA, nuclear weaponsWorld War III - 2019 Opinion of a Russian military expert The United States has set a course to achieve overwhelming nuclear superiority in order to blackmail Russia and China. It must be understood that the Americans will extend it to other countries, including allied ones, but capable of pursuing an independent foreign policy, such as Turkey. The conclusion about the inevitability of the US attempt ...Analytical Service Analytical Service [email protected] Author In the middle of Russia
World War III in 2018 -
World War III military-political review
dudinkaplus.ru
Five places where World War III could start in 2018
World War III in 2018 - military-political review, prophecies, predictions
Where and when will the Americans strike?
Recently, the previously forgotten threat of a third world war is again a topic of general discussion. A week ago, US and Russian military vehicles nearly collided in Syria. NATO is building up military potential on the border with our country and is not going to give up hostile rhetoric. What are the scenarios for a possible military conflict? It is necessary to think about this in order to prevent not entirely adequate actions of our "Western partners", who have long since turned back into "probable adversaries."
Military analyst Valentin Vasilescu from Romania, a country at the forefront of NATO's anti-Russian front, tries to answer this question based on the tactics and characteristics of the weapons used in recent US military operations. On the pages of the English-language analytical center "Katehon" he claims that the aggression of the United States and its allies against Russia is not an excluded scenario. The United States is obliged at all costs to stop Russia, which, through its actions in Syria, and before that in Crimea and Ukraine, is changing the American-centric status quo. In order to maintain hegemony, the Americans are going to a big war.
Main direction of impact
According to Vasilescu, the main direction where one should expect a US strike is the western one. "The US does not plan to land in the Russian Far East, instead, like Napoleon and Hitler, the US will seek to occupy the strategically important capital of the country - Moscow," he sums up. According to him, the goal of Euromaidan was initially to create a convenient springboard for aggression against Russia. Lugansk, the analyst notes, is only 600 kilometers from Moscow. However, the plan of American aggression was thwarted after the reunification of Russia with the Crimea and the creation of people's republics in the East of Ukraine.
After that, the plan of American aggression was revised, and the Baltic direction was chosen as a new zone of aggression. From the Latvian border to Moscow - all the same 600 kilometers, and even closer to St. Petersburg. In order to prevent the local population from being outraged that their countries would soon be turned into a springboard for aggression, the American and local media and generals in unison started talking about the fact that the Baltic and Northern European countries were in danger of being attacked by Russia. In Norway, they even launched a series about the future Russian occupation.
In addition, the United States stepped up pressure on Sweden and Finland. They are not joining NATO yet, but the American troops have already been deployed. Moreover, in May 2016, the northern quintet - a meeting of the foreign ministers of Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway and Iceland announced that the Russian threat must be urgently neutralized. As a way out, defense cooperation between the Swedish-Finnish neutrals and NATO was proposed.
According to Valentin Vasilescu, NATO's main task is to inflict a quick defeat on Russia, which will force the country's political system to collapse. Pro-American agents of influence are overthrown, Vladimir Putin, and the war can be considered won. Therefore, the United States will act according to Hitler's logic, relying on blitzkrieg tactics. In the event of Russia's defeat, NATO will occupy territories up to the St. Petersburg-Veliky Novgorod-Kaluga-Tver and Volgograd line.
At the same time, as the expert notes, due to the rapid modernization of the Chinese army, which will pose a serious danger to the United States in the Pacific theater of operations, the Pentagon will not be able to throw all the necessary forces and means against Russia. At least a third of all US military forces will have to be concentrated in the Pacific region, waiting for a possible strike from China, now allied with Russia.
Probable time of impact
According to the military analyst, the US has a chance of success only if it invades before 2018. After 2018, the chances of success will decrease significantly, since after the completion of the rearmament of the Russian army begun under Sergei Shoigu, the Pentagon will lose its technological advantage in conventional weapons. And in order to win the war, one will have to resort to nuclear weapons - and this is a step towards mutual nuclear destruction.
War in the air - colossal losses
The main targets of the first wave of air raids will be Russian airfields and air defense systems. Russia is armed with high-class fighters and mobile air defense systems capable of detecting and destroying even fifth-generation American aircraft. Therefore, even with the support of NATO allies, the US military will not be able to achieve air superiority. With great effort, they can achieve temporary air superiority in some zones on the Russian border 300 kilometers deep. In order to secure flights in those areas where Russian air defense systems are actively operating, the Americans will be forced to deploy at least 220 aircraft (including 15 B-2 bombers, 160 F-22A and 45 F-35 bombers) in the first attack wave. The B-2 can carry 16 GBU-31 laser-guided bombs (900 kg), 36 GBU-87 cluster bombs (430 kg) or 80 GBU-38 bombs (200 kg). The F-22A aircraft can carry 2 JDAM bombs (450 kg) or 8 bombs of 110 kg each.
A serious obstacle for the Americans will be the fact that the AGM-88E missiles, designed to combat air defense systems with a range of 160 kilometers, are too large to be loaded inside the F-22A and F-35s (4.1 m long and 1 m high). If they are installed on pylons, the vaunted "invisibility" of these aircraft will suffer. Previously, this problem did not arise, since in the last 20 years the United States has waged wars exclusively against opponents with outdated air defense systems.
As for the F-22A, they will be shot down for the most part. According to the expert, Pentagon reports indicate that the US military was satisfied with the results of the use of the F-117 (the first fifth-generation aircraft in the US Air Force) in Kuwait and Yugoslavia and intended to replace obsolete models with new devices. The Pentagon planned to order 750 F-22As to replace the F-16s. However, Russia has developed a 96L6E radar capable of detecting US stealth. The Pentagon reduced the order to 339 F-22As as a result. While the Americans were developing and testing these aircraft, Russia had S-400 systems capable of detecting these devices. As a result, the US Air Force received only 187 F-22A aircraft.
To make it more difficult for Russian air defense systems, the US will launch more than 500-800 cruise missiles from ships and submarines in the Baltic Sea. Russian aircraft, primarily MiG-31 fighters, and air defense systems will be able to neutralize most of these missiles, the expert is sure, but this is not all that the Americans can use.
At the same time, F-18, F-15E, B-52 and B-1B aircraft, while at a safe distance from the Russian border and not entering the range of S-400 systems, will strike with AGM-154 mini-cruise missiles or AGM-158, the range of which is up to 1000 kilometers. They can hit ships of the Russian Baltic Fleet and missile batteries of the Iskander and Tochka complexes. If successful, the Americans will be able to neutralize 30 percent of the Russian radar network, 30 percent of the S-300 and S-400 battalions stationed between Moscow and the Baltic countries, and 40 percent of the components of the automated intelligence, control, communications and target designation system, in addition, airfields will suffer, more than 200 planes and helicopters will be blocked.
However, the expected losses of the Americans and their allies will be 60-70 percent of the aircraft and cruise missiles that will enter Russian airspace during the first wave of air raids and strikes.
But what will be the biggest obstacle to NATO gaining air supremacy? According to the expert, these are effective means of electronic warfare.
We are talking about the Krasukha-4 complexes of the SIGINT and COMINT types. These systems can effectively conduct electronic warfare against American Lacrosse and Onyx tracking satellites, ground and air-based radars (AWACS), including those deployed on RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft and Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk drones.
According to the expert, the electronic warfare systems in service with the Russian troops can effectively interfere with American bombs and missiles with laser, infrared and GPS guidance.
Also, Russia can create two zones impenetrable to enemy aircraft on the border with the Baltic countries in the areas of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad by combining air defense systems (S-400, Tor-M2 and Pantsir-2M) and electronic warfare.
Currently, 8 S-400 battalions protect the sky around the Russian capital, one is located in Syria. In total, the Russian armed forces have 20-25 S-400 battalions. Some of them can be deployed to the western border along with 130 S-300 battalions, which can be upgraded and equipped with the 96L6E radar, which effectively detects NATO "stealth". Currently, an even more advanced air defense system, the S-500, is being tested, which is expected to go into service with the troops in 2017.
The author is sure that due to the advantage of Russia in the means of electronic warfare, NATO will not be able to achieve an advantage in electronic warfare. As a result, in the first wave of attacks against Russia, NATO wax will strike decoys in 60-70 percent of cases. Due to the high losses in the first wave of air strikes and the impossibility of achieving air superiority, the NATO Air Force will suffer high losses. The American grouping of 5,000 aircraft will be joined by their allies. But they will not be able to provide more than 1,500 aircraft.
War at sea
At sea, the Pentagon can put up to 8 aircraft carriers, 8 helicopter carriers, several dozen landing craft, missile carriers, destroyers and submarines. These forces may be joined by two Italian aircraft carriers and one aircraft carrier each from Spain and France. Russian anti-ship defense systems - cruise missiles X-101 and NK Kalibr - move at subsonic speed and can be neutralized at the initial stage of approach. It will be more difficult for NATO to cope with the P-800 Oniks and P-500 Bazalt missiles. And, finally, in 2018, the Russian fleet will receive an "aircraft carrier killer" - the 3M22 Zirkon missile, capable of moving at hypersonic speeds at low altitudes. "The United States will not be able to oppose anything to this means," the expert concludes.
Superiority in armored vehicles
The armored vehicles currently in service with the Russian army - T-90 and T-80 tanks and upgraded versions of T-72 tanks, Vasilescu notes, correspond to NATO counterparts. According to the expert, only the BMP-2 and BMP-3 are inferior to the American M-2 Bradley.
However, the new T-14 "Armata" tank has no analogues in the world. In all respects, it surpasses the German Leopard 2, the American M1A2 Abrams, the French AMX 56 Leclerc, and the British Challenger 2. The same can be said about the T-15 and Kurganets-25 infantry fighting vehicles and the new amphibious armored personnel carrier VPK-7829 Boomerang. After 2018, Russia will have the most modern armored vehicles, which will radically change the balance of power on the battlefield.
During the Gulf War and the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the United States used mobile teams of tanks, vehicles, armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles to break into enemy defenses. The actions of these groups in Russia will have to be supported by massive airborne operations. And here they are in for an unpleasant surprise. If against the Russian air defense systems Pantsir and Tunguska, as well as against the Igla and Strela MANPADS, American combat helicopters and aircraft can use the AN / ALQ-144/147/157 electronic warfare system, then against the 9K333 MANPADS "Verba", entering service with the Russian troops in 2016, this equipment is powerless.
Self-guided sensors "Verba" are able to operate simultaneously at three frequencies in the visible and infrared spectra. "Verba" can work in conjunction with the "Barnaul-T" system, responsible for electronic intelligence, electronic warfare and automatic control of landing formations. "Barnaul-T" neutralizes the radar of enemy aircraft and interferes with the laser guidance systems of enemy missiles and bombs.
As can be seen from the above analysis, even now a war with the use of conventional weapons can cost our Western adversaries dearly. The rearmament of the Russian army, which will take place by 2018, will completely eliminate the technological advantage of the West in the military sphere. The more ready, powerful and equipped our Armed Forces are, the less likely it will be that the West will decide on an open war against Russia.
World War III military-political review
The media is increasingly talking about riots in one or another corner of the world. Conflicts occur both at the level of gangs and between heads of state, and this is fraught with global military clashes. At the level of modern weapons, any war will be bloody and destructive, leveling the city, leaving widows, widows, orphans.
Some believe that World War 3 has been going on for a long time and it is informational, when facts are distorted, half-truths are presented as truth, and lies are presented as an alternative point of view. Slander is not as harmless as it seems at first glance in any country there are, on the basis of false evidence, illegally convicted.
If a global intergovernmental conflict is brewing, everything can end in military action. So, will World War 3 start in 2020? What do famous clairvoyants, psychics, monastics, astrologers of the present and past think about this?
In the twentieth century Vanga was the most famous clairvoyant. Both ordinary people and the government elite came to her for advice. After her death, years later, scientists analyzed how accurately her predictions came true and it turned out that over 80% of what she predicted came true. According to researchers, this is a very high percentage, which indicates Vanga's undoubted prophetic gift.
Clairvoyant predictions for 2020:
- Vanga said that from 2020 China will become the world superpower. Those countries that used to be leaders will fall into various economic dependencies, the standard of living of citizens in them will fall.
- From 2020, trains on wires will rush towards the sun. Interpreters think that she meant the invention of some new engines powered by solar energy.
- The clairvoyant warned of Syria, in which there would be a war. It will fall and this will be the beginning of World War 3.
- Vanga said that from 2020 oil will no longer be produced all over the world and the earth will rest.
The monastic claimed that in 2020 the people of the Russian Federation would unite. He predicted the beginning of the war this year. Abel believed that the dark time would last no more, a lot - 9 years.
Experts and in our time are arguing how to decipher this or that quatrain of Nostradamus? The prophet looked 5 centuries into the future. Reality has changed so much that no wonder Nostradamus could not understand something, describe it incorrectly, make a mistake somewhere.
There are no specific dates in the quatrains, as the states about which the story is told are called, there are many allegories in the quatrains, but the researchers manage to guess what the prophet was talking about. This is especially true of key and significant events that have already taken place. Here is what is to be experienced in the near and more distant future:
- Experts deciphered that the prophet predicted floods in Europe in 2020. Why will they happen? Because of the showers, which will pour without stopping, 2 months. From one quatrain, which mentions the enemy in red, experts concluded that countries located near the seas of the oceans and whose flag has red color will suffer more than others. This is Italy, with the Czech Republic, Hungary, with Montenegro, England.
- In early June 2020, severe fires will break out across Russia. Before they are eliminated, the center will be scorched. Why will this happen? Due to abnormal heat both in Russia and around the world. To hide from stuffiness and heat, people will begin to move to the northern regions for permanent residence. There is another interpretation of the sizzling rays. Researchers assure that one of the bandit groups from the Middle East will use chemical weapons.
- In the East, an armed conflict will break out again, as a result of which many military and civilians will die. European leaders will act rashly and war will break out in a number of other countries. The conflict between those who profess Christianity and different denominations will escalate.
3 world will cover the entire planet. Nostradamus believed that Siberia would become the center of civilization at that time. People from all over the world will come to live in Russia and the country, along with China, will be the strongest in the world.
How did Wolf Messing see the future?
Many are sorry that no one wrote down the predictions for Messing. The prophecies have been lost because of this, and others have an unclear chronology, but researchers say that there is something for 2020.
Will World War 3 happen? Messing, believed that no, but predicted various achievements and changes for humanity.
According to the prophet, America in 2020 will begin hostilities in the East. It will be the mistake of those in power. There will be a recession in the economy, tension among the people will increase. In addition, America will suffer from various natural disasters.
Taiwan, a natural disaster will befall Japan, but Messing did not specify what exactly would happen. Due to instability in the EU countries, the euro will fall.
Predictions of the Matrona of Moscow
Many Orthodox believers revere the Matrona of Moscow. Much was revealed to her spiritually. She knew that the house of the Romanovs would fall and in 1917 a revolution would take place.
It was open to mother and the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the Second World War. Researchers claim that her ominous prediction will affect our days and people will begin to die when there is officially no war, they will be alive in the evening, and in the morning everyone will be dead. Some researchers think that Matrona meant some kind of spiritual death of the people, others are inclined that such a number of sudden deaths indicates an earthquake or an atomic explosion.
Prediction of the future by Jonah of Odessa
The monastic elder said that no one would attack Russia in the future. Do not be afraid of aggression from the United States.
Batiushka claimed that World War 3 would begin to emerge in a country smaller than the Russian Federation. There, there will be internal unrest and a civil war will break out. The Russian Federation, with the USA and other countries will take part in it - this will be the beginning of World War 3.
By the way, Archimandrite Jonah from Odessa claimed that he would die, 1 year would pass, and those sorrowful events would begin. Indeed, he reposed in December 2012. 1 year passed in Ukraine, unrest began, there was a "Euro Maidan" ...
Prediction of astrologer Pavel Globa
He believes that in 2020 Russia is not threatened with anything more than sanctions. There is a cold war going on in the world.
The US and Europe are expected to increase the unemployment rate, their currencies will fall in price. In the world, the EU will no longer be such an influential union as before.
Globa in 2020-2021 does not foresee World War 3. Military clashes will continue to arise in certain countries.
There is a decline in the West, and the Russian Federation during this period will attract, unite and influence the countries that were part of the USSR in the past. More and more natural disasters will arise in the world due to the riots of nature, and countries will support each other to the best of their ability.
On August 22, 2018, the third world economic war will begin, namely, a full-scale US sanctions attack on Russia.
Symbolically: again on the 22nd! Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said on this occasion that the restriction of the activities of Russian banks announced by US sanctions would be tantamount to declaring "economic war" on Russia. Since the United States is waging sanctions and trade wars not only with Russia, but also with China, Iran, and even Europe, with seventeen countries in total, it can be said that a world economic war is starting. At the borders of Russia, a Nazi foothold has again been created, this time in the former Ukraine by Bandera, again created by the United States together with other Western demagogic "democracies".
As one American general said, the United States does not want to fight on an equal footing, so they attack in the area where they have an advantage: in the financial and economic. They are so comfortable. And it is convenient for Russia to respond asymmetrically in other areas, on other platforms. According to Dmitry Medvedev, Russia will respond not only by political and economic, but also by "other methods." What methods might these be?
In this sense, Russia can do a lot of "useful" things for the US. Stop cooperation not only with the United States, but also with its main vassals in areas that have a dual purpose: in space, energy, aviation and others. Expand economic and military ties with countries independent of the United States. Impose economic and energy sanctions against American satellites on Russia's borders, as they are potential springboards for a military attack. What is stopping Russia, as the US is doing, from helping "regime change" scenarios in their colonies? This, at the very least, will bring them down into chaos.
In Helsinki, Trump and Putin agreed, as follows from some comments, on the non-use of nuclear weapons on the territory of the United States and Russia. The rest of the world can be a theater of war, as the US Congress just passed the John McCain American Military Budget Act. If the US went crazy after McCain, then this is the starting point.
Following the example of the United States, it is possible to discuss at an expert level possible scenarios for delivering preventive strikes against the American bridgeheads advanced towards Russia in the event of a threat of an attack on Russia. As the United States did during the 1962 Caribbean Missile Crisis against Cuba.
Russia can become a security supplier for all countries independent of the United States, supplying them with air defense systems and other defensive weapons. For example, Venezuela. In addition, Russia can assist insurgents around the world in their struggle for freedom against pro-American colonial regimes and death squads created by the US CIA.
The United States accuses Russia of a cyber war, so it is necessary to proceed from this and present counter-accusations of the US NSA in attacks on Russian Internet resources that exist, and suppress these sources of cyber attacks. International law does not prohibit anything in cyberspace, and the US refuses to negotiate with Russia to regulate the Internet, so everything is allowed!
In a world war, all countries will have to decide one way or another in order not to find themselves between the millstones. In fact, it has already developed that Russia is carrying out military containment of the United States, and China is carrying out financial and economic containment. Europe is thinking about how not to become a theater of war, while Turkey is already working in a regional alliance with Russia and Iran, and publicly accuses the United States of sanctioning "outrages."
There is still room for compromise as long as President Trump confronts Congress and is not removed from power until ideological accusations come into play. In Congress, some crazy people are already declaring Russia a sponsor of terrorism. Russia continues to call the Americans partners, friends and colleagues overseas. With irony, of course. But other appeals are also being prepared, Vladimir Zhirinovsky utters them when he talks about US neoliberal fascism. Statements about the world leadership of the only superpower of the United States, the uniqueness and uniqueness of this leadership, the US support for neo-fascist regimes in the world indicate precisely the new American fascism.
World economic war can still slide into a global financial and economic crisis. Lord Jacob Rothschild recently addressed the world: “The years of low interest rates and US policies that blew the capitalization of the stock markets are now coming to an end. The world economic model will be completely destroyed, the victims of the crisis will be, first of all, countries with a high level of external debt.”
Pretty clear message that explains why Russia, with its small budget, successfully stands up to the financial monsters of the world: Russia has a real economy, and the monsters have an inflated stock capitalization. Therefore, we can agree with Karen Shakhnazarov, who believes that sanctions will only benefit Russia if we approach this matter wisely. The West was peacefully sucking Russia in, but Putin's Russia was in his throat, that's the whole point, according to our eminent director and already a political scientist.
And about Trump and his possible impeachment. In this extreme case, Vladimir Putin can bring down the political situation in the United States with one phrase: “But Trump is my agent!” And it doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, and what he meant in general ...